Optional for sub-receivers without billing models. Can be modified if necessary. Developed by the subcontracting subcommittee, you can find here. Development of a subaward model for the flow of federal funds to foreign subcontractors. Updated subaward sample for use in multi-site nih clinical trials. myGRANT Institutional Issues Attention: If it is a research project funded by a private for-profit commercial sponsor, funded by: 1) private funds from the commercial enterprise (excluding clinical studies sponsored by a pharmaceutical company); or 2) funding for innovation research for small businesses (SBIR); or 3) financing technology transfer for small businesses; or four. a combination of the aforementioned for-profit funds (SBIR, STTR, private for-profit funds), even if they are transferred to the UH as part of a subcontract; or five. The Centre of Excellence for Ocean Science Research (CEROS) and the Hawai`i Technology Development Venture (HTDV). For these suggestions, please be sure to answer “Y” for yes, under the field “SBIR/STTR” in myGRANT. Co-chairs can be reached at subawards@thefdp.org or via their individual email addresses below.

Example of subcontracting. Recommended use: outsourcing under a federal contract (or with a revision, a non-federal agreement). eRA: Please contact Amanda Humphrey: a.humphrey@northeastern.edu if you have any problems loading these models into your systems. To create FAQs on FDP Foreign Subaward models. This subaward sample was created to assist in the issuance of fixed-rate subawards to registration offices as part of NIH-funded clinical/clinical research studies. Please note that this example should only be changed if required by your NIH price. Changes should only be made to Appendix 2B, which is provided in the form of a Word document, to facilitate review and negotiation with clinical research sites. Created to help institutions discuss possible subaward language in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The new models (Oct 2019 version) are included in the Uniform Guidance for the use of all new sub-premiums awarded under grants and cooperation agreements after December 26, 2014. To create an optional DTUA language for possible inclusion in the FDP sub-prime model. Conducts more rigorous risk assessments at the institute and project level for new and ongoing subawards. A checklist of additional terms and conditions that institutions may wish to include as sub-premiums to foreign companies.

Change of model to include UG in existing subawards – to be used when the main auction for PTE uniform Guidance (UG) is submitted and an amendment must be issued to sub-receivers whose initial agreement is subject to the previous OMB circulars. This modification model will cause UG to flow to the sub-receiver. Recording training for the use of models and important updates. Documents the major changes in 2015 to the current provisional fixed-rate clinical research sample. Change of model for submissions issued under UG – Is used when a change is to be issued to a sub-receiver who is already subject to uniform instructions according to the original Subaward. Documenting the significant changes from 2017/8 to 2019 Subaward models. Please use the form and instructions to request a change in the content of the FDP subcommittee. This form will help the co-chairs work on the issues raised and determine how to submit them to FDP members. If you notice any typos in the Subaward model, please email the co-chair at subawards@thefdp.org FDP Subaward Templates. Recommended use: national educational or non-profit institutions under state-subsidized grants or cooperation agreements. Please note that these samples need to be reviewed based on your institution`s guidelines and the needs and location of the research project, etc.

We strongly recommend that competent institutional officials be advised to ensure that